(ORDO News) — Court officials are forging ahead with preparations for the high-stakes $250 million civil fraud trial against former President Donald Trump, set to commence on Monday. This legal showdown, a culmination of months of legal wrangling, will see Trump facing allegations of “persistent fraud” in connection with the valuation of his assets.
The trial has been a focal point of public attention and legal maneuvering, particularly in light of Judge Arthur Engoron’s sweeping ruling issued on Tuesday. In a scathing rebuke, Judge Engoron ordered the cancellation of the Trump Organization’s business certificates in New York, citing the pervasive nature of the alleged fraud perpetrated by Trump and his co-defendants.
However, this far-reaching decision, while a significant blow to Trump’s business interests, leaves several crucial questions unanswered. The judge made it clear that a trial was still necessary to address six remaining causes of action presented by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Additionally, the scope of potential penalties, including the possibility of barring Trump from real estate acquisitions and loan applications in New York, remains to be determined.
As a result, Wednesday’s pretrial hearing was marked by efforts to untangle the implications of Judge Engoron’s ruling and clarify the trajectory of the upcoming trial. Trump’s attorney, Chris Kise, sought clarification on how the ruling would affect not only the trial proceedings but also Trump’s numerous individual business entities.
Judge Engoron responded by suggesting the possibility of dismissing some of the remaining causes of action to streamline the trial. However, the attorney general’s representative expressed a desire to proceed with these arguments, deeming them relevant to their requested remedies.
The issue of which of Trump’s many business entities would be subject to the cancellation of business certificates also arose during the hearing. Kise asked for confirmation on this matter, emphasizing the need for clarity considering the multitude of entities and employees involved.
Judge Engoron did not provide an immediate response, deferring the issue to a future private meeting between counsel. This lack of immediate clarity left Trump’s defense uncertain about the trial’s scope and implications.
Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, characterized the ruling as “nonsensical” and “outrageously overreaching.” She expressed the defense’s uncertainty regarding the trial’s parameters and indicated that they would need to assess the impact of the ruling on the trial scheduled for Monday.
Habba also confirmed Trump’s intention to appeal the judge’s decision promptly, describing it as “fundamentally flawed.”
During the hearing, there appeared to be a consensus between Trump’s legal team and the government regarding the appointment of Barbara Jones, an independent monitor, as the independent receiver responsible for overseeing the dissolution of the canceled limited liability companies (LLCs). Judge Engoron indicated his likely intent to issue a ruling formalizing Jones’s appointment.
Another point of discussion during the hearing concerned a defense motion to limit the testimony of expert witnesses at trial. The defense indicated their intention to withdraw the motion without prejudice, leaving room for potential disputes over expert witnesses to be addressed on a case-by-case basis.
In the wake of Tuesday’s ruling, which concluded that Trump and his co-defendants had fraudulently inflated the value of various properties, including Mar-a-Lago and Trump’s triplex apartment in New York City, tensions surrounding the trial have intensified. Eric Trump, who oversees the Trump Organization’s daily operations, decried the ruling on social media, asserting the company’s sound financial record and characterizing the legal proceedings as “persecution.”
Notably, Judge Engoron previously imposed sanctions on five defense lawyers during a pretrial conference, penalizing them $7,500 each for presenting “frivolous arguments.”
Trump has sought to delay the trial’s commencement, and an appeals court is expected to rule on these motions imminently, potentially influencing the trial’s timeline and dynamics.
As the legal saga unfolds, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on the forthcoming trial, which carries immense legal, financial, and political implications for Donald Trump and the Trump Organization. The trial promises to be a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal challenges faced by the former president, further shaping the narrative of his post-presidential life.
—
Online:
News agencies contributed to this report, edited and published by ORDO News editors.
Contact us: [email protected]
Our Standards, Terms of Use: Standard Terms And Conditions.
To eliminate any confusion arising from different time zones and daylight saving changes, all times displayed on our platforms are in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).