Psychiatrist said that there are levels of consciousness that are not associated with brain activity

(ORDO NEWS) — Professor Swaran Singh says there may be levels of consciousness that come from something deeper than just brain activity.

University of Warwick psychiatrist Swaran Singh attempted to uncover the scientific validity of mystical experiences by describing his own transcendental encounter as he emerged from general anesthesia.

Describing the strange phenomenon in detail in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, Professor Swaran Singh explains how he came to “understand the cosmos, not in the cognitive sense of knowledge, but on the basis of an experience that is difficult to formulate.”

An unusual event occurred almost 40 years ago, on April 4, 1984, during postoperative recovery from a serious car accident.

Since then, Professor Singh has devoted himself to the study of objective science, but insists that this experience “becomes more and more prominent in my sense of self and my understanding of the relationship between the empirical and the transcendent.”

Describing the experience, he shows that it was imbued with a “noetic quality” which is defined as “a sense of revelation and full understanding”. According to the author, the strange phenomenon lasted ten to 12 minutes and allowed him to “know something completely and completely that I had never known before.”

“I don’t know how I know, but I know I know,” he writes, before moving on to explain how he came to fully understand the interplay between “space, time, energy, matter, and life.”

“Life changes from one form to another, but the total amount of life force remains constant and unchanged,” he says.

“The increase of one form comes at the expense of another, and in the case of life, one form of life appears at the expense of the disappearance of another.”

In trying to establish the source and legitimacy of this unexpected upload, Singh insists that “these phenomena must have a neural basis.”

Going deeper into this issue, he discusses how activation of brain regions such as the insular cortex, premotor cortex, and lower parietal lobe have been implicated in mystical experiences during meditation or under the influence of psychedelic drugs.

He also notes that any such changes in his own brain activity were most likely provoked by a “toxic state of confusion”, but at the same time claims that the knowledge gained during the experience was reliable.

He thus embraces the gulf between empirical science and the indefinable power of pure experience, and argues that while neural activity undoubtedly determines our mental processes, certain levels of consciousness can be derived from something deeper than just brain activity.

“Brain states are mechanisms. They matter,” he writes. “And subjective meaning cannot be reduced to a state of the brain, regardless of the strength of the statistical connection between the two.”

Ultimately, the scientific paper is intended to highlight a philosophical paradox that threatens to thwart our quest for a scientific explanation of consciousness, experience, and ultimately reality itself.

Outlining this seemingly fundamental conflict, Singh concludes that “I cannot know whether I experienced a lucid dream or something else.”


Contact us: [email protected]

Our Standards, Terms of Use: Standard Terms And Conditions.