(ORDO NEWS) — I certainly hope we don’t live in a matrix computer simulation world, but sometimes I can’t help but think that it is. William Cowper once said that God moves in mysterious ways.
Mark Twain supported this idea, saying that the truth is stranger than fiction. And Arthur Clarke did not object, summarizing that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Naturally, who knows what our monastery actually looks like?
A few years ago I had the pleasure of reading Ted Chiang’s story about an alternate universe called ” Tower of Babel “.
At the time, I found it entertaining and to some extent praised the author for thinking outside the box.
Now I think there’s more to this story, and if there’s anyone to ask a few questions about how our world works, it’s Ted Chiang.
Brief description of the plot of the “Tower of Babel”:
Illalum is a miner from Elam who was called to the Tower of Babel, a huge brick tower that has been under construction for many centuries.
He and his colleagues were hired to excavate the vault of heaven to discover Yahweh’s creation. Illalum alone passes safely through the Vault.
After a perilous upward journey, he finds himself back on the surface, some distance from the Tower, and not in Heaven as expected.
Ted Chiang’s biography does not reveal where he may have gotten his knowledge from, but I believe that this “climb up to come out below” story is excitingly coincidental to be mere coincidence.
And even if it was Ted’s vivid imagination and nothing else, it made me think of the controversy between flat-Earths and spherical-Earths.
It amuses me that our current heliocentric understanding of the world is a model. How can it be a model? Model of what? In any case, the definition of our current narrative of the world and the universe is as follows:
Heliocentrism is an astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun, which is at the center of the universe.
According to this model, the Earth is a sphere or something like that. They say that an ordinary globe is a pretty good visual representation of the real state of affairs.
From everything we know, it follows that if we go to the east, we will come to the west. In other words, we will circle the globe and arrive at the same place where we started.
Naturally, one way to represent our journey around the globe, projected onto a flat map, would be the following image.
Our snake moves to the east and, having circled the globe, it turns out to be in the west. The same thing happens in the opposite direction.
Planes, as we know, only fly east to west or west to east . In my image below, the numbers 1 and 2 should occupy the same coordinate grids, or be in the same place on the globe of the Earth.
1 and 2 represent the same place.
And if No. 1 and No. 2 are in the same place on the globe of the Earth, then No. 3 and No. 4 are not. According to the story, the North Pole and South Pole are separated by 20,000 km.
3 and 4 are not the same place.
Here’s one more thing we need to remember about airplanes flying around. NASA Reference Publication 1207 entitled ” Derivation and Definition of the Linear Aircraft Model ” states the following:
This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a fixed-mass rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, non-rotating Earth.
How can they fly in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, non-rotating Earth while still satisfying the concept of a spherical Earth?
At this point, I think the answer might be a programmer god-created planet based on a computer simulation.
Matrix
Now, welcome to the Matrix, or say hello to Hyperborea, since it is my hypothesis that Admiral Richard E. Byrd had the opportunity to visit it. What exactly did he say in his interview?
He said something like this:
But, oddly enough, today there is an area the size of the United States in the world that has never been seen by man. And it’s over the pole, on the other side of the South Pole from Little America.
What land was he talking about? I think he could be talking about Hyperborea. We all know that Hyperborea, if it existed at all, was located in the region of the North Pole.
On the other hand, the admiral definitely meant the South Pole and… beyond. As we know, there is no officially undiscovered “area”. We only have Antarctica itself, and that’s it.
Unless, moving towards the South Pole, he didn’t come to… The North Pole and ended up on the other side of the continent he was on. The continent we usually call Hyperborea… one that doesn’t exist on our maps.
In other words, if you look at our usual map, then Hyperborea will be divided into two parts:
Antarctica – one half of Hyperborea
The Arctic is the other half of Hyperborea.
It would look something like this map compilation below.
Or something like this on one of the old maps…
In the conventional flat-earth model, there is supposedly a problem with counter-rotating stars in the southern hemisphere. I heard that there is an explanation for this, but I haven’t seen it yet.
Well, if we are part of some kind of computer simulation, then the program will work in exactly the same way with two pre-programmed hemispheres.
It goes without saying, but this setup will only work under one condition, and only under one… The Matrix.
God moves in mysterious ways.
Truth is stranger than fiction.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
If you were among those people who create a “common vision of the world” and had to present a convenient “politically correct” model of the above simulation world… which model would you choose?
Could it be that the spherical earth model was forced on us because there was no better way to twist the truth while simultaneously using certain laws of the simulation available?
It seems that in order for it to work, the regions of the North and South Poles must be closed and they are closed to everyone.
Both the North and South Poles are known for their extremely cold temperatures. By the way, you know that there is no land at the North Pole.
Those who created this false picture want us to think that due to altitude and other factors, the North Pole is much warmer than the South. Of course, we have no way to test this.
Maybe the North and South Poles are covered with ice because they are two halves of the same continent… Hyperborea?
Who knows, maybe there’s a reason why we have this Mandela effect associated with the North Pole ice cap .
Of course, many will say that a flat earth is simply impossible, but what about a toroid?
In conclusion, I advise you to read another entertaining story by Isaac Asimov ” The Last Question “.
We all wondered: “How did it all begin?”. And they answered us: “From the Big Bang.” Or maybe it all started with a bottle of whiskey and a drunken argument?
—
Online:
Contact us: [email protected]
Our Standards, Terms of Use: Standard Terms And Conditions.